Premier League · 2026/27
Fulham
Early season. Only 19 matches have been played, so opponent-adjusted ratings are unstable. Teams have not met often enough to separate a strong attack from a weak opponent. Treat these as directional.
Over 2 matches, Fulham create most danger down their left (1.80× the league norm), and concede most down their left (1.53×).
2 scored, level with xG
4 conceded, level with xGA
Where the shots come from
Shots taken
every shot, or counted by zoneFulham, 2026/27 · 25 shots in the final 35m, 2 scored. Shape carries the outcome rather than colour, so it reads in print and to anyone who cannot separate the hues.
vs league average · 1.00 marked · share of xG
Shots taken
every shot, or counted by zoneFulham, 2026/27 · 25 shots in the final 35m, 2 scored. Shape carries the outcome rather than colour, so it reads in print and to anyone who cannot separate the hues.
vs league average · 1.00 marked · share of xG
Shots faced
every shot, or counted by zoneFulham, 2026/27 · 30 shots in the final 35m, 4 scored. Shape carries the outcome rather than colour, so it reads in print and to anyone who cannot separate the hues.
vs league average · 1.00 marked · share of xG
Flanks and routes
Danger conceded by flank
left against right · open play onlyFulham concede more down their left: more attacks there, and better ones.
- Attacks faced
- 1.50×
- Chance quality
- 1.56×
Shots on the weak flank per shot on the strong one
xG per shot on the weak flank versus the strong one
Set pieces are excluded, since a corner has no flank. Sides within ten points of an even split are treated as level, since a season is short enough that smaller gaps are usually noise.
Crosses or through balls
open play onlyFulham take 5% of their open-play danger from crosses and 36% from balls played through the middle. Their main route is through balls.
Measured from the action immediately before each shot. This shows whether a side works the ball wide or through the middle; which flank they progress down cannot be derived, because no free source publishes pass locations.
Who does the work
Territory and pressing
1.00 = league averageFulham move the ball about as the league does.
- Territory won0.85×
5.5 deep completions a match
- Territory allowed1.15×
7.5 conceded a match
- Pressing1.56×
8.0 opponent passes per defensive action
- Freedom to build1.38×
17.3 of their own passes allowed
- Danger per arrival0.92×
0.222 npxG per deep completion
A deep completion is a pass finished within about twenty yards of goal, and PPDA counts an opponent’s passes per defensive action. A lower figure is a harder press, so the bar inverts it to keep every row reading the same way. This describes where the ball ends up rather than how it travelled: no pass or carry record exists in this data, so progressive passes and carries are genuinely out of reach rather than merely absent.
Share of attacking output
non-penalty xG plus expected assistsFulham’s attack is effectively 6.6 players. A side spread across fourteen absorbs an absence that one built on nine does not.
- Gonzalo García31.7%
- Joshua King11.5%
- Alex Iwobi10.5%
- Sander Berge10.1%
- Antonee Robinson6.1%
- Jorge Cuenca5.8%
Share of the squad’s non-penalty xG plus expected assists, so it counts chances taken and chances given alike. Penalties are left out because they describe who the club nominates rather than who creates. Contributors under 2% are not listed, though they still count towards the spread above.
Creator to finisher
shots and xG per pairing- Sander Berge→Gonzalo García0.3 xG1 shot · 0g
- Alex Iwobi→Joshua King0.3 xG1 shot · 0g
- Jorge Cuenca→Antonee Robinson0.2 xG1 shot · 0g
- Oscar Bobb→Gonzalo García0.1 xG1 shot · 0g
- Alex Iwobi→Gonzalo García0.1 xG1 shot · 0g
- Timothy Castagne→César Palacios0.1 xG1 shot · 0g
- Joachim Andersen→Emile Smith-Rowe0.1 xG1 shot · 0g
- Emile Smith-Rowe→Gonzalo García0.1 xG1 shot · 0g
The pass immediately before the shot, so a player who starts moves without playing the final ball will not appear here. Roughly seven in ten shots name their creator.
How the season splits
Danger by scoreline
leading, level or behindFulham produce most of their danger while behind (62% of their xG).
- Ahead0%
- Level38%
- Behind62%
- Ahead
- 0%
- 0.0 xG · 0 shots
- Level
- 38%
- 1.0 xG · 8 shots
- Behind
- 62%
- 1.5 xG · 17 shots
The scoreline at the moment each shot was struck, rebuilt from goal times. Sides that trail often will look busier in attack than they really are.
Home and away
same team, two recordsFulham are a noticeably different side by venue, creating 0.44 xG more per match at home, and conceding 1.05 more.
Shots faced and shots stopped
two different jobsFulham allow 2.09 xG a match, and concede 0.0 more goals than the league converts that into.
- Chance prevention
- 2.09
- Shot stopping
- -0.0
xG allowed per match. Mostly the outfield shape, and it tends to repeat.
Goals prevented against the league rate. Largely the keeper, and it swings year to year.
Measured against the league’s own conversion rate rather than raw xG. Blocked and off-target shots carry xG that can never be scored, so comparing goals to raw xG would mark every side in the division as leaky. A high block share means bodies in the way rather than chances denied.