Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Chelsea · 2026/27

Small sample. Only 82 minutes this season, so the per-90 rates below swing heavily on a handful of moments. Read them as description, not as form.
npxG per 90
0.72
1 non-penalty goals
xA per 90
0.14
0 assists · 2 key passes
Finishing
+0.4
vs league conversion rate
Build-up per 90
0.00
82 minutes · 2 games

Pedro Neto ranks 0th of 0 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 10.4m on average. They carry 11% of Chelsea’s attacking output, the 5th largest share in the squad.

This week

Next fixture

Gameweek 2

vs Brighton

Sun 30 Aug, 13:00 UTC

Brighton concede 12.5 shots a match and are 0.99× the league norm against defenders. Roughly an average matchup.

Projected shots
3.09

3.29 per 90 × 0.94

Projected on target
1.30

2.20 per 90 × 0.59

Season rate multiplied by what this opponent concedes relative to the league. It assumes a full ninety minutes and takes no account of rotation, so check availability before reading anything into it.

Shots

2 appearances
  • Over 0.5100%± 0
  • Over 1.550%± 35
  • Over 2.50%± 0
  • Over 3.50%± 0

Share of appearances clearing each line, with one standard error. Blank appearances count as misses, 0 of 2 here, so these are lower, and more honest, than rates built only from matches where the player got a shot away.

Shots on target

2 appearances
  • Over 0.550%± 35
  • Over 1.550%± 35
  • Over 2.50%± 0

Share of appearances clearing each line, with one standard error. Blank appearances count as misses, 0 of 2 here, so these are lower, and more honest, than rates built only from matches where the player got a shot away.

Where the shots come from

Where they shoot

3 shots
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Pedro Neto, 2026/27 · 3 shots in the final 35m, 1 scored. Shape carries the outcome rather than colour, so it reads in print and to anyone who cannot separate the hues.

left
0%
Centre
92%
right
8%

share of their shooting xG

Chance quality

xG per shot, distance, how they arrive
xG per shot
0.218
Shots per 90
3.29
Key passes per 90
2.20
Average shot distance
10.4m
From set pieces
0%

How their chances arrive

Crosses
0%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
8%
Headed
0%

What they are for

Roles

penalties, set pieces, crossing, partnerships
  • Corners and set piecesSupplies 9% of Chelsea’s dead-ball danger, from 1 delivery that became shots.
  • On the pitch46% of the minutes available to them.

Partnerships

  • Feeds João Pedro2 shots, 0.13 xG
  • Fed by Morgan Rogers1 shot, 0.60 xG
  • Fed by Enzo Fernández1 shot, 0.06 xG
  • Fed by Emiliano Martinez1 shot, 0.00 xG

A share of the attack says how much runs through Pedro Neto. These say what would have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker or the corner deliverer is not the same as losing a proportional slice of output, and a partnership cuts both ways: the supplier being absent damages the finisher’s numbers too.

Who they play with

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Morgan Rogers0.6 xG1 shot · 1g
  2. Enzo Fernández0.1 xG1 shot · 0g
  3. Emiliano Martinez0.0 xG1 shot · 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. João Pedro0.1 xG2 shots · 0g

Season record

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Pedro Neto carries 0.0% of Chelsea’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.000
    0% of defenders
  • Possession value per 900.717
    0% of defenders

Thin sample. Only 82 minutes, so this describes a cameo. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance. It is a possession-value measure rather than a passing one: it cannot tell a forty-yard carry from two sideways balls, because no pass or carry record exists in this data.

Match log

most recent first
  • vs Brighton1g
    2 shots2 OT
  • at Fulham
    1 shot0 OT

Solid marks are on target, faded ones off.