Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Nottingham Forest · 2025/26

Igor Jesus

npxG per 90
0.24
5 non-penalty goals
xA per 90
0.09
4 assists · 15 key passes
Finishing
-0.7
vs league conversion rate
Build-up per 90
0.07
2379 minutes · 37 games

Igor Jesus ranks 111th of 398 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 13.9m on average, with 36% of their danger coming from set pieces. They carry 11% of Nottingham Forest’s attacking output, the 2nd largest share in the squad.

This week

Next fixture

Gameweek 2

away to Liverpool

Sat 29 Aug, 11:30 UTC

Liverpool concede 11.5 shots a match and are 0.94× the league norm against forwards. Roughly an average matchup.

Projected shots
2.46

2.65 per 90 × 0.93

Projected on target
0.78

0.79 per 90 × 0.98

Season rate multiplied by what this opponent concedes relative to the league. It assumes a full ninety minutes and takes no account of rotation, so check availability before reading anything into it.

Shots

37 appearances
  • Over 0.586%± 6
  • Over 1.559%± 8
  • Over 2.524%± 7
  • Over 3.514%± 6

Share of appearances clearing each line, with one standard error. Blank appearances count as misses, 5 of 37 here, so these are lower, and more honest, than rates built only from matches where the player got a shot away.

Shots on target

37 appearances
  • Over 0.543%± 8
  • Over 1.511%± 5
  • Over 2.53%± 3

Share of appearances clearing each line, with one standard error. Blank appearances count as misses, 5 of 37 here, so these are lower, and more honest, than rates built only from matches where the player got a shot away.

Where the shots come from

Where they shoot

70 shots
Every shotBy zone
Opponent goalLeftRight
GoalNo goalMark area is the chance’s expected goals

Igor Jesus, 2025/26 · 70 shots in the final 35m, 6 scored. Shape carries the outcome rather than colour, so it reads in print and to anyone who cannot separate the hues.

left
11%
Centre
70%
right
19%

share of their shooting xG

Chance quality

xG per shot, distance, how they arrive
xG per shot
0.103
Shots per 90
2.65
Key passes per 90
0.57
Average shot distance
13.9m
From set pieces
36%

How their chances arrive

Crosses
26%
Through balls
13%
Own dribble
3%
Headed
22%

What they are for

Roles

penalties, set pieces, crossing, partnerships
  • PenaltiesTakes them: 1 of 3 Nottingham Forest were awarded.
  • When it mattered3 of 6 goals came with the game level or Nottingham Forest behind.
  • On the pitch70% of the minutes available to them.

Partnerships

  • Feeds Morgan Gibbs-White6 shots, 1.47 xG
  • Fed by Neco Williams7 shots, 1.14 xG
  • Fed by Callum Hudson-Odoi5 shots, 0.90 xG
  • Fed by Omari Hutchinson6 shots, 0.74 xG

A share of the attack says how much runs through Igor Jesus. These say what would have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker or the corner deliverer is not the same as losing a proportional slice of output, and a partnership cuts both ways: the supplier being absent damages the finisher’s numbers too.

Who they play with

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Neco Williams1.1 xG7 shots · 1g
  2. Callum Hudson-Odoi0.9 xG5 shots · 0g
  3. Omari Hutchinson0.7 xG6 shots · 1g
  4. Morgan Gibbs-White0.6 xG10 shots · 0g
  5. Nicolás Domínguez0.6 xG4 shots · 1g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Morgan Gibbs-White1.5 xG6 shots · 3g
  2. Omari Hutchinson0.5 xG4 shots · 1g
  3. Elliot Anderson0.1 xG1 shot · 0g
  4. Nicolás Domínguez0.1 xG1 shot · 0g
  5. Ibrahim Sangare0.0 xG1 shot · 0g

Season record

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Igor Jesus carries 2.0% of Nottingham Forest’s build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.070
    10% of forwards
  • Possession value per 900.323
    17% of forwards

Ranked against 109 forwards with a comparable sample. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance. It is a possession-value measure rather than a passing one: it cannot tell a forty-yard carry from two sideways balls, because no pass or carry record exists in this data.

Tackles, blocks and recoveries

per 90 · 2025/26

They account for 5.0% of their club’s recorded defensive work.

  • Tackles0.94
    67% of FWD
  • Blocks, clearances, interceptions1.49
    58% of FWD
  • Recoveries2.39
    58% of FWD
  • Defensive contribution4.83
    64% of FWD

Rates from 2,293 minutes, ranked against 33 forwards with a comparable sample. The feed publishes season totals rather than a match-by-match record, so there is no hit rate against a line here. That needs the distribution, which no arithmetic on a total can recover. This statistic begins in 2025/26, so there is no earlier season to compare against.

Match log

most recent first
  • vs Bournemouth
    3 shots1 OT
  • at Manchester United
    1 shot0 OT
  • vs Newcastle United
    4 shots3 OT
  • at Chelsea1g
    2 shots2 OT
  • at Sunderland1g
    1 shot1 OT
  • vs Burnley1g
    2 shots1 OT
  • vs Aston Villa
    2 shots0 OT
  • at Tottenham1g
    2 shots2 OT
  • vs Fulham
    1 shot0 OT
  • at Manchester City
    2 shots1 OT

Solid marks are on target, faded ones off. 5 further appearances produced no shot and are not listed, but are counted in the rates above.

See Nottingham Forest