Skip to content
Touchline

Search

Jump to a club, a player, or a section

Wolverhampton Wanderers · 2023/24

Nathan Fraser

Small sample. Only 175 minutes this season, so the per-90 rates below swing heavily on a handful of moments. Read them as description, not as form.
npxG per 90
0.22
0 non-penalty goals
xA per 90
0.03
0 assists · 2 key passes
Finishing
-0.4
vs league conversion rate
Build-up per 90
0.09
175 minutes · 7 games

Nathan Fraser ranks 0th of 402 qualified players for attacking involvement, shooting from 18.2m on average.

This week

Shots

7 appearances
  • Over 0.543%± 19
  • Over 1.50%± 0
  • Over 2.50%± 0
  • Over 3.50%± 0

Share of appearances clearing each line, with one standard error. Blank appearances count as misses, 4 of 7 here, so these are lower, and more honest, than rates built only from matches where the player got a shot away.

Shots on target

7 appearances
  • Over 0.529%± 17
  • Over 1.50%± 0
  • Over 2.50%± 0

Share of appearances clearing each line, with one standard error. Blank appearances count as misses, 4 of 7 here, so these are lower, and more honest, than rates built only from matches where the player got a shot away.

Where the shots come from

Where they shoot

3 shots
0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots33% of shots · 1 shot0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots33% of shots · 1 shot0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots33% of shots · 1 shot0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots0% of shots · 0 shots33%33%33%Opponent goalLeftRight
Share of shots<1%1–2%2–4%4–6%6%+

Nathan Fraser, 2023/24 · final 35m.

left
73%
Centre
0%
right
27%

share of their shooting xG

Chance quality

xG per shot, distance, how they arrive
xG per shot
0.144
Shots per 90
1.54
Key passes per 90
1.03
Average shot distance
18.2m
From set pieces
0%

How their chances arrive

Crosses
0%
Through balls
0%
Own dribble
0%
Headed
0%

What they are for

Roles

penalties, set pieces, crossing, partnerships
  • On the pitch5% of the minutes available to them.

Partnerships

  • Feeds Pedro Neto1 shot, 0.04 xG
  • Feeds Jean-Ricner Bellegarde1 shot, 0.03 xG
  • Fed by Mario Lemina2 shots, 0.38 xG
  • Fed by Matt Doherty1 shot, 0.05 xG

A share of the attack says how much runs through Nathan Fraser. These say what would have to be replaced. Losing the penalty taker or the corner deliverer is not the same as losing a proportional slice of output, and a partnership cuts both ways: the supplier being absent damages the finisher’s numbers too.

Who they play with

Chances received

who supplies them
  1. Mario Lemina0.4 xG2 shots · 0g
  2. Matt Doherty0.1 xG1 shot · 0g

Chances created

who they supply
  1. Pedro Neto0.0 xG1 shot · 0g
  2. Jean-Ricner Bellegarde0.0 xG1 shot · 0g

Season record

Involvement in build-up

excludes their own shots and final passes

Nathan Fraser carries 0.2% of Wolverhampton Wanderers’ build-up value.

  • Build-up per 900.085
    11% of forwards
  • Possession value per 900.341
    7% of forwards

Thin sample. Only 175 minutes, so this describes a cameo. Build-up is the value of possessions a player was involved in with their own shots and final passes removed, so it credits the work before the chance. It is a possession-value measure rather than a passing one: it cannot tell a forty-yard carry from two sideways balls, because no pass or carry record exists in this data.

Match log

most recent first
  • at Aston Villa
    1 shot0 OT
  • vs Fulham
    1 shot1 OT
  • at Newcastle United
    1 shot1 OT

Solid marks are on target, faded ones off. 4 further appearances produced no shot and are not listed, but are counted in the rates above.